UNITE! Info #290en:

On quackery warfare (2) - Some medical history

Intro note:

Infectious diseases spreading faster than ever: U.N.

Last Updated: 2007-08-23 9:17:32 -0400 (Reuters Health)

By Laura MacInnis

GENEVA (Reuters) - Infectious diseases are emerging more quickly around the globe, spreading faster and becoming increasingly difficult to treat, the World Health Organization (WHO) said on Thursday.

[In fact there are no "infectious diseases" at all, and never have been any.]

In its annual World Health Report, the United Nations agency warned there was a good possibility that another major scourge like AIDS, SARS or Ebola fever with the potential of killing millions would appear in the coming years.

[The fact that there is no "HIV", and nothing that might justifiably be characterized as a "particular disease" or "syndrome" "AIDS", today already is known to not so few people, in several countries. The so-called "SARS" "infectious disease" of 2003 was exposed as a complete hoax too, after which the imperialists had to cease more or less completely their particular terror propaganda about that. The affliction known as "Ebola" has been publicly exposed as not due to any "virus", as the big-time liars still "have it", but caused by vaccines, all of which contain dangerous poisons and none of which have any positive health effects whatsoever; they are in fact weapons of war, as importantly pointed out for instance by the "GLAC", defending the Congolese  and other African peoples against the massive openly-violent and sneak-type wars on them, and scientifically demonstrated above all by the "klein-klein-aktion" group in Germany.]

"Infectious diseases are now spreading geographically much faster than at any time in history," the WHO said.

[Since there just aren't any, no such of course are "spreading" either, whether "fast" or "slowly".]

It said it was vital to keep watch for new threats like the emergence in 2003 of SARS, or severe acute respiratory syndrome, which spread from China to 30 countries and killed 800 people.

[Meaning, "vital" to keep inventing new such "threats", with which to terrorize people everywhere and "hopefully" to maim and kill some more of them with medically quite unjustified new vaccination programmes.]

"It would be extremely naive and complacent to assume that there will not be another disease like AIDS, another Ebola, or another SARS, sooner or later," the report warned.

[It would in fact be naive and complacent for ordinary people to believe one single word that the "WHO" says on this, once they've gotten to know that vital fact that this institution is a terrorist one, in the service of the ruling exploiters, oppressors and mass murderers in the world, and in particular largely controlled by persons trained at the US imperialists' military-directed "EIS", a "CIA of medicine".]

Since the 1970s, the WHO said, new threats have been identified [no, invented] at an "unprecedented rate" of one or more every year, meaning that nearly 40 diseases exist today which were unknown just over a generation ago.

Over the last five years alone, WHO experts had verified [conjured up the phantoms of] more than 1,100 epidemics of different diseases.

With more than 2 billion people traveling by air every year, the U.N. agency said: "an outbreak or epidemic in one part of the world is only a few hours away from becoming an imminent threat somewhere else."

The report called for renewed efforts to monitor, prevent and control epidemic-prone ailments such as cholera, yellow fever and meningococcal diseases.

[Which all in fact have non-contagious causes.]

International assistance may be required to help health workers in poorer countries identify and contain outbreaks of emerging viral diseases such as Ebola and Marburg hemorrhagic fever, the WHO said.

["Marburg" too is a vaccinations-induced affliction, having nothing to do with any "virus".]

It warned that global efforts to control infectious diseases have already been "seriously jeopardized" by widespread drug resistance, a consequence of poor medical treatment and misuse of antibiotics.

[Since there are neither any viruses nor any bacteria that can cause any disease in humans, animals or plants - the latter only possibly producing poisons under oxygen-poor conditions, that is, in dead biological matter - there are no such that might get "dangerously drug-resistant" either. And, quite contrary to a widespread propaganda about this, all use of antibiotics is harmful and nothing else, since it attacks those very microbes which, in reality, have as their function to heal diseases when these have reached a certain stage. It means fighting the firebrigade instead of the fire.]

This is a particular problem in tuberculosis, where extensively drug-resistant (XDR-TB) strains of the contagious respiratory ailment have emerged worldwide.

"Drug resistance is also evident in diarrheal diseases, hospital-acquired infections, malaria, meningitis, respiratory tract infections, and sexually transmitted infections, and is emerging in HIV," the report declared.

Although the H5N1 bird flu virus has not mutated into a form that passes easily between humans, as many scientists had feared, the next influenza pandemic was "likely to be of an avian variety" and could affect some 1.5 billion people.

[The giant "bird flu" terror scam of 2005-2006 they're making another feeble effort to "revive", after they had to break it off almost completely and very suddenly in April 2006 because it had gotten publicly exposed so totally and in detail - see for instance my Infos #251en, #252en, #256en and #266en with certain quotes on this, and the book (even though only in German) in March 2006, "Die Vogelgrippe - Der Krieg der USA gegen die Menschheit" ("The Bird Flu - The War of the USA against Humanity") nailed that terror scam and its perpetrators so perfectly that there was nothing left for the latter to do concerning this than to "fall for the allure of retreat", as Bush recently has characterized such strategic defeats of theirs.]

"The question of a pandemic of influenza from this virus or another avian influenza virus is still a matter of when, not if," the WHO said.

["We still would like to see that 'bird flu' terror scam revived." Well, "big-time" terrorists, why don't you come on and try this now, and see what will happen!]

It said all countries must share essential health data, such as virus samples and reports of outbreaks, as required under international health rules, to mitigate such risks.

Accidents involving toxic chemicals, nuclear power and other environmental disasters should also be communicated quickly and clearly to minimize public health threats.

[Here the "WHO" is even treating readers to a whiff of  its imperialist masters' "green" (anti-industrial) warfare too, by alluding to those purported "nuclear power accidents" at TMI in the USA in 1979 and at Chernobyl in the then Soviet Union in 1986, both of which have long since been exposed as criminal manipulations having, together with the massive and fantastic government and media lying about these events, which has 10,000-folded their actual effects, some motives of the very darkest reaction as their actual respective backgrounds.]

[END OF QUOTE]

A longer COMMENT:

In the entire "culture" of the reigning capitalist/imperialist social "order" of today, the concepts of (bacterial and viral) "infections", and of "epidemics", even "pandemics", play an important role; these are all "household words" which everybody - at least in the "western world", and probably this is largely the case globally too - has gotten to "learn about" from his or her childhood on.

In fact they are all complete frauds, reactionary fantasies which have their origins not only in that "famous scientist" Louis Pasteur of the 19th century - correctly contradicted already by his contemporary Antoine Béchamp and since more than a decade back today completely exposed as a swindler - but in false ideas and conscious swindles, which have suited the ruling classes for purposes of oppression and terror against the masses of people, since many centuries back.

In that important book from 2006 which I mentioned above, "Die Vogelgrippe...", by Stefan Lanka, Hans-Ulrich Niemitz, Veronika Widmer and Karl Krafeld, the co-author Stefan Lanka (virologist and microbiologist) in one chapter brings some important, and really sensational, points concerning also the history of this. Everything, as far as I can see, points to his being right in that which he maintains and which completely overturns some purportedly "well-established facts" of medical history. In that chapter is pointed out, among other things:

1) The concept of "leprosy", already mentioned in the Christian Bible, in reality was a political one, by which the ruling cliques via their clergy arbitrarily defined some people opposed to them as "having a dangerous contagious disease", so that they "had to" be isolated from all others, "set out". The very term for "leprosy" in German for instance was, and still is, "Aussatz", meaning actually the act of setting some people out, in isolation, which in practice condemned them to utter misery and, in most cases, death.

2) The so-called "Great Plague" or "Black Death" in Europe in the 14th century was not an "epidemic" either - such, in reality, are simply not possible - but above all the result of a large earthquake which shook the main cultural and social centres in the Mediterranean area, Venice, Avignon (where the Pope resided) and many other cities in the year 1348 (other sources point to its date as the 25th of January 1348), and caused, firstly, much of the social organization then to break down, that is, misery and death for many people, and secondly, the confidence of many in the social order to break down too. The misery was aggravated by the onset of a period of much colder climate than before, the so-called Little Ice Age.

(The fact of whose existence, incidentally, that swindle institute of the imperialists' on matters of the climate, the IPCC, most primitively tried to "lie away", together with the fact of the Medieval Warm Period of some 1,000 years ago, by presenting in 2000 its infamous "Hockey Stick" falsified graph of  temperature history, in order to make its ridiculous "manmade global warming" scam, one of the main "excuses for" the last years' enormous petrol price rises, "more credible".)

In that situation, from the year 1348 on, the then ruling cliques invented the term "plague", or in most continental European languages, "pest", for use about, and against, people who in some way or other opposed them. It largely "replaced" the earlier one of  "leprosy" and was likewise in reality a political term. The still today circulating stories, in all the ruling reactionaries' mass media, schools etc, about "how enormous" was the number of people killed in Europe in a few years beginning in 1348 have been demonstrated to be very much exaggerated, in the first place, and those about the cause of this - "a big epidemic" - are clearly refuted too, by today's actual medical science, in the second place.

The most important part of that science - Stefan Lanka is pointing out too - is the (radically new, and internationally still very unknown) German New Medicine, developed by Ryke Geerd Hamer from 1981 on. Its findings can be found on the Net, for instance at the GNM Entrance Page.

After those "Big Plague" years from 1348 on, there in the following centuries was no talk of  "plague" or "pest" any more - the mysterious "entity" that purportedly had "caused" it, today "debated" among the medical swindlers "what kind" of "bacteria" or "virus" it was - for some "unknown reason" just having "suddenly disappeared", and was replaced by talk of something called "smallpox", which purportedly for instance "caused" many deaths in London in 1660 - in reality above all caused by poisonings due to bad sanitation in that already then crowded city.  A "smallpox virus" is and was just as non-existing as a "plague virus". On this, an article by Stefan Lanka from 2001, exposing as frauds the "photographs" of many "well-known" but in reality non-existing "viruses", is very instructive, and also a follow-up of his from 2006, "Are there and can there be diseasecausing viruses?" (translated into English by me).

A main trick of the reactionary swindlers' in this connection is their constantly inventing new terms for purportedly existing "new diseases" or "new viruses", trying to make people think that those new terms "must correspond to some reality or other" - which is precisely what they don't. Or - a variation of the same trick - they're putting the same name on different (actual or imagined) diseases which have appeared at different points in time, trying to make people think "same name - must be the same thing".

3) The so-called "Spanish Flu" of 1918-19, likewise a "well-known big epidemic", about which there was much renewed lying in connection with the 2005-6 "bird flu" scam, was also not an "epidemic" (of course - such were no more possible then than in 1348 or today), but was a result, above all, of the famine in many countries due to World War I at that time, also combined with that winter's being very cold in Europe.

The US writer Eleanora I. McBean in a chapter of her (otherwise instructive) book in 1977 "Swine Flu Expose", which is on the Net, rightly pointed out that the "Spanish Flu" did not "originate in Spain" and was not caused by any "earlier unknown virus", but maintained that it "was caused [in its entirety] by vaccinations". She herself had experienced, living as a child at Fort Dix in the USA, where there was a military training centre, how everybody except her family was vaccinated and precisely her family was the only one that didn't get sick at all.

That writer at that time (1977) probably still didn't know that there can be no "epidemics" at all. It's quite possible, indeed likely, that much sickness at that time - hitting not least young, healthy men and very often soldiers in the much-vaccinated US army - was due to vaccinations. But these were not the main cause of the "Spanish Flu" - the number of whose victims, just as that of "the Great Plague", has also been exaggerated enormously in the reactionaries' mass media.

4) Both before and during World War II, the then ruling Nazis in Germany carried out many "practical" experiments on people concerning how, and whether, diseases could be transferred from person to person - by a purportedly existing "process of infection". All those experiments clearly showed that - "unfortunately" for these and other arch-reactionaries - this was impossible. After WW II, the US imperialists continued such experiments, on "volunteers", the last one, "Operation Whitecoat", with Jehovah's Witness "conscientious objectors" to armed service having "offered" themselves as "guinea pigs" for this, ended in 1972 in utter failure as to any "infection" whatsoever, as had all the others. About this result, notably enough, I've been unable to find one word on the Internet, for instance by any of those who justly have protested against the atrocity of this kind of "scientific experimentation".

In 1952, as Stefan Lanka further wrote, the Australian Frank MacFarlane Burnet published, in the US magazine Scientific American, his research result that the infection hypothesis had been an error and that "infectious diseases" had "lost their terror", something which caused great alarm in the Pentagon and later made Burnet receive the Nobel price in 1960 as a sop for making him shut up about this.

Lanka didn't mention - probably he didn't know - that MacFarlane Burnet has been lauded as "Australia's greatest epidemiologist", with a big research institute named after him, and that he sincerely had hoped that with "biological warfare", the imperialists he served might "wipe out" large numbers of Chinese, of which there in his opinion were "far too many". His own research result in 1952 thus deeply disappointed him, as the results of the US imperialists' massive attempts at "biological warfare" against Korea and China in the Korean war precisely in the two preceding years did prove "a big disappointment" to those mass murderers too.

But this - to the reactionaries so "tragic" fact that "biological warfare" simply is not possible, that bacteria and viruses, so to speak, are "much too nice" for it to be possible to "train them into" attacking some people (or animals) - is something which they still today very much are trying to keep secret too.

In all armies, including the Swedish one where I've served as a conscript, there still today officially remains a concept "NBC warfare" ("Nuclear, Biological and Chemical"). The only warlike thing you can do with bacteria however is to use the poisons that some of them produce - NB only under oxygen-poor conditions, that is, in dead biological matter. But this then can only be characterized as one type of chemical warfare. The "B" in "NBC warfare" is out, is utter reactionary fantasy and nonsense. This covers that "anthrax terror" too which was a big international scare after the US imperialists' infamous terror attacks against "their own" people (and others) on 11.09.2001. It was poison, and not "contagious germs", that the white powder mailed in some letters by some ultra-rightists in the USA then contained. And people handling mail at the post-sorting centrals here in Europe for instance needn't have been alarmed, had they only been told that such poison, even if they had gotten it on their hands, could not have hurt them at all.

In conclusion:

A warfare having to do with biology and/or medicine there certainly is, but one of a quite other nature than that purported by the reactionary media. The very real quackery warfare not least consists in scaring people of imaginary "diseases", in the first place, and in pressing them to take poisonous purported "medicines" against the imaginary "AIDS", for instance, or to accept vaccinations which do no good at all but likewise are only poisonous, in the second place. The imperialists' mass media themselves are an important weapon for them in this, one which needs to be countered with actually scientific information, on the largest scale possible.

On the "UNITE! (etc) Info" posting series, see Note.

Previous English-language items, see UNITE! Info series, 1995 -.