UNITE! Info #026en-rep: |
|
|
China, early '76, on nukes etc
|
|
|
Intro note, 2008:Here's a html version of my Info #026en, originally posted in text document form to newsgroups etc in 2 parts, part 1/2 and part 2/2, on 18.01.1997.I'm making this Info available in a more easily readable form now because of a continued debate about the arch-reactionary anti-nuclear-energy campaign and anti-industry campaign in general, and about who have always been its perpetrators and instigators - which some Trotsky-adhering and other bourgeois forces still are trying to hide away - in the first place, and for submitting that Peking Review article from 23.01.1976 which makes up its main part also to the Marxists Internet Archive (MIA), in the second place. On the anti-nuclear-energy campaign in the world, and on the entire "green" (anti-industrial) warfare by the imperialists against the people in all countries, see also several articles listed under those subjects in my homepage section "Subjects in postings". |
||
Intro note (longish because of some important connections) [1997]:In this Info is reproduced an article published in the Peking Review No. 4/1976, 23.01.1976 (pp. 49-51): "Human Cognizance and Utilization of Energy Sources Is Never-Ending - Refutation of 'exhaustion of energy sources'", by Chin Hua.This article shows some of the basic standpoints of Marxists on the question of energy in general and also on that of nuclear energy in particular. In China at that time, the genuinely Marxist, extremely successful ideological and political line of Mao Zedong, who then since four decades back was Chairman of the Communist Party of China and who had made and still was making that important further development of Marxism-Leninism which is known as Mao Zedong Thought, was being followed. Today, the arch-reactionary bourgeois propaganda syndrome which this article attacks, the propaganda directed against modern energy sources in general and against nuclear energy in particular, and saying i.a. that "the energy sources are being exhausted", has gone much further still than 21 years ago. This campaign is only one part of a most rabid and massive attack against the workers and the oppressed peoples, above all, on the part of the main bourgeois forces in the world today, a "green" warfare consisting of a whole series of anti-industry, anti-technology, anti-science and anti-growth campaigns in the ideological, political and economic fields. For the Marxists, it's extremely important to combat these campaigns. They're supported too, or at least covered up, precisely by a large number of organizations which are pretending to be "Marxist" - in some cases, even directly maintaining that they're "adherents of Mao Zedong Thought", i.e., that they're opposing modern revisionism (phoney "Marxism") - but which in reality are nothing but muppets of ultra-reaction, arch-enemies of the peoples. (In some cases, "anti-nuke" "revolutionaries" perhaps may be excused by their ignorance - of much use to the workers they're not.) One reason why I'm bringing this article is that it hits at those phoney forces, by showing what was the standpoint of some genuine adherents of Mao Zedong, over 20 years ago. The article does have certain weaknesses too, above all in that it offers no real explanation of why those bourgeois forces had now started engaging in that propaganda against industry, technology, science and growth. The main reason for this apparently was not in fact discovered by the Chinese communists. And later in the same year, revisionists started that overthrow of socialism in China which took place between November 1976 and approximately the end of 1978. In Europe, more than 140 years ago, Marx himself had already seen that element in bourgeois society which is the main factor behind the "green" warfare of today. He said, in a speech in London in 1856, i.a.: "Steam, electricity and the self-acting mule were revolutionists [NB!] of a rather more dangerous character than the very citizens Barbes, Raspail and Blanqui." (See "UNITE! Info #5en", of 27.07.96, or the Marx-Engels archive at <http://www.marx.org>.) [Note, 2008: That link still works today, leading to the main page of the Marxists Internet Archive (MIA). The main address of it today however is http://www.marxists.org/.]And it was in Europe, too, that the real motives behind the anti-nuclear-energy campaign and the other anti-industrial campaigns in modern time were publicly disclosed for the first time, by two articles published as leaflets by the then still revolutionary party KPD/ML (NEUE EINHEIT) in (West) Germany in the spring of 1977. (I've reproduced them in German as "Info #7de", on 07.04.96. [Added in 2008: See Einl., Teil 1/3 etc.] Translation so far exists only into Swedish.) My "Info #4en", of 21.03.96, contains an analysis in English of those bourgeois attacks, largely based on that of the former KPD/ML (NEUE EINHEIT). [Added in 2008: See part 1/2 etc.] I'll return to the subject. During the time when China was turning revisionist, there still were some articles in the Peking Review attacking the anti-nuclear-energy campaign. One, in issue 22/1977, quoted from a speech by Yu Chiu-li on 04.05.1977 at the National Conference on Learning From Taching in Industry among other things [said] this: "Chairman Mao said as early as in 1955: 'We have entered a period, a new period in our history, in which what we have set ourselves to do, think about and dig into is socialist industrialization, socialist transformation and the modernization of our national defence, and we are beginning to do the same thing with nuclear energy.' "Another article, in PR No. 15/1978, "Utilization of Nuclear Energy and the Struggle Against Hegemony", in itself correctly pointed out: "With rapid progress in the peaceful utilization of nuclear energy, a struggle is intensifying between the Soviet Union and the United States on one side, and the second and third world countries on the other. The former are seeking to maintain their monopoly in this field while the latter are fighting to foil the superpowers' attempts."This did point out one of the motives behind a large part of the anti-nuclear-energy campaign, but (whether consciously or not) was silent on the main motive behind it, the one that caused this campaign to be so massively engaged in within the USA itself, for instance. (See the Marx speech mentioned, and/or "Info #4en".) [Added in 2008: See #004en, part 1/2 etc. The link "Marx speech" here goes directly to it at MIA.] And furthermore, such articles, on the part of the then Chinese leadership, also contained a great deal of cover-up and vile hypocrisy, for at that very time, those same persons were engaging in massively supporting some ultra-reactionary phoney"Marxist" forces in (West) Germany, who among other things precisely combated nuclear energy, against the (then) correct Marxist-Leninist forces there, who were upholding Mao Zedong's line completely and thus also supported the use of nuclear energy. On 10.10.1978, the latter /the NE/ published an important leaflet i.a. smacking that obvious contradiction into the faces of the now revisionist Chinese leadership. I rendered that one in Swedish too. [Added in 2008: That Swedish translation is not on the Net. Its title, however, can be found in the document at my homepage showing the titles of the items in my (mainly Swedish-language) leaflet series "INFORMATIONSBLAD". It was that of item 9 in that series, published on 31.01.1979: "Vad man bör beakta när det gäller den nuvarande kinesiska ledningen - Om det att köpa kärnenergi och samtidigt understödja den ökända anti-kärnenergi-kampanjen här i landet - ". In English, that would be: "What Should Be Taken into Consideration concerning the Present Chinese Leadership - On buying nuclear energy and at the same time supporting the infamous anti-nuclear-energy campaign here in this country -".]Here follows the 1976 PR article, from then still socialist China: |
||
Human Cognizance and Utilization ofEnergy Sources Is Never-Ending- Refutation of "exhaustion of energy sources"by Chin HuaThe essence of energy is motion of matter. The world of matter is never-ending, as are the motion of matter and energy in nature. Therefore, human cognition and utilization of energy sources also is never-ending. Chairman Mao has said: "The history of mankind is one of continuous development from the realm of necessity to the realm of freedom. This process is never-ending." The history of development of the cognizance and utilization of energy sources in nature is also a vivid description of a dialectical process of development. Of course, transformation of energy sources is carried out under definite conditions; so is energy in nature transformed into energy available to humanity. In class society such conditions are determined by class struggle, the struggle for production and the levels of scientific experiment. The practices of human beings are developing continuously. Therefore, energy sources have been constantly developing. What was not considered energy sources previously have been changed into important energy sources. The process of the struggle in the cognizance and utilization of energy sources is precisely one in which human beings incessantly study the conditions of transformation so as to render more and more energy available for the progress of society. Theoretically Wrong ViewsIn China, Ssuma Kuang (1019-1086 A.D.), a disciple of Confucius and Mencius, preached that "material and wealth in nature are finite" at a time when the landlord class was becoming increasingly reactionary. In Europe, when the bourgeoisie was becoming more and more reactionary, the "theory of the death of heat" by Clausius appeared. He maintained that with the continuous dissipation of heat, there would finally be a limited state in which no heat energy could be found which can be transformed into mechanical power, even though the world's total amount of heat energy did not decrease at that time. The universe would then remain in a somewhat inert and rigid condition. His assumption tallied with the needs of the reactionary classes so much so the Pope listed it as one of the "scientific evidences" for proving the existence of God. Basing himself on the dialectical-materialist principle that motion is indestructible, Engels thoroughly criticized Clausius' theory, pointing out that "the indestructibility of motion can not be merely quantitative, it must also be conceived qualitatively." (Introduction to Dialectics of Nature.) The development of the natural sciences has continued to confirm Engels' brilliant thesis. At present, with the deepening of the imperialist system's crisis, the reactionary view of "energy exhaustion" is once again being blared to cover up that system's decline. One U.S. paper exclaimed: "We can see the bottom of the barrel." The Soviet revisionists talk nonsense such as: "Mankind has before it a genuine catastrophe - energy hunger". These reactionary views not only run counter to the materialist-dialectical theory of knowledge, but also to the historical facts of energy development. History of Energy DevelopmentThe same is the case with discoveries of natural gas reserves. Nearly 2,000,000 million cubic metres were found in 1939 and 70,000,000 million cubic metres in 1974. All this demonstrates that increasing amounts of global energy resources like petroleum, natural gas and coal have been steadily discovered. Moreover, there is a long way to go before humanity discovers all the deposits and makes full use of them. New energy sources which can be utilized by humans are on the increase. With the progress of human society, nature's range of energy sources which can be utilized is always being extended. New energy sources are being discovered. Humans only knew how to burn wood as energy in ancient times. However, several thousands years ago, coal and natural gas were used as energy. In the 20th century, we started utilizing nuclear energy. Viewed from how energy as a motive force was utilized, the earliest sources of energy as power in production was natural mechanical energy like water and wind power which could be used directly. Afterwards, through the use of steam engines, heat energy was transformed into mechanical energy, so that the naturally abundant mineral fuels became power sources for social production. Since the 19th century when the transformation of electric energy and other energies was discovered, electric energy has become the most widely used form of energy. Nuclear fission energy, which is now being used extensively by the power industry, and nuclear fusion energy, whose power is much greater than that of nuclear fission, will become energy sources too. As soon as controlled thermonuclear reaction comes into being, the vast expanse of sea water will become an inexhaustible energy source. It is estimated that the energy stored in deuterium in the world's oceans can be used for 10,000 million years, if the present level of consumption is maintained. In addition, the earth itself is a big thermal energy reservoir. It has an enormous amount of heat along with energy countless times greater than the total energy of deposits of coal, petroleum and natural gas - the present primary energy sources. Utilization of the abundant energy contained in terrestrial heat is only in its infancy. Free from pollution, solar energy has not yet been directly used on a large scale. Besides, with the development of human society, new energy sources will be discovered to serve the people. Utilization efficiency by human beings is getting higher. The development of energy sources shows that humanity not only is continuously extending the range of energy utilization, but also raising its utilization efficiency. For example, the thermal efficiency of the steam engine attained in its initial stage was only several per cent, but now it goes as high as 30-40 per cent. With the development of industrial production and the rising of technical levels, the utilization efficiency of energy is getting higher and higher. For instance, popularization of steam power apparatuses with a large capacity and high parameters, promotion of gas input parameters of the gas turbine, application of gas-steam combined cycles and the magneto-hydrodynamic generator and fuel cells now being studied - all these are pioneering the way to higher energy utilization efficiency. The utilization rate of uranium in nuclear fission energy sources is being raised time and again. In the thermal neutron reactor generally used for its power nowadays, the rate can only reach 1-2 per cent, but it might be raised to 60 per cent by using the fast-neutron breeder reactor. In short, the history of the development of energy sources fully testifies that "ideas of stagnation, pessimism, inertia and complacency are all wrong." Reflection of the Crisis of Capitalist SystemThe so-called energy crisis in the capitalist world today is a product of the imperialist system itself and an indication of its aggravating decay. Bragging about her prosperity, the United States boasts that her population constitutes only 6 per cent of the world's population but the energy sources she expends are one-third of the world's total. This is a typical example of waste and destruction of energy sources due to decadent relations of production. Energy sources in the United States are consumed in large quantities for arms expansion and war preparations, 10 per cent of the petroleum and 33 per cent of the industrial electric power are devoted to the production of munitions.The reactionary and decadent nature of Soviet revisionist social-imperialism is also reflected in the question of energy sources. It wantonly plunders the third world's energy sources for high profits. In the past few years, its imports of low-priced crude oil from the Middle East have sharply increased: 100,000 tons in 1967, over 7 million tons in 1972, and over 13 million tons in 1973. The Soviet revisionists compelled the Arab countries to pay for their munition debts with cheap petroleum which was resold to European and American countries at a much higher price in order to rake in enormous profits. It is because of the wild exploitation and plunder by the imperialists, especially the two superpowers, that the third world has to use petroleum as a weapon against them. "Energy exhaustion" and "hunger for energy" uttered by the two superpowers actually mean the crisis of their policy of plunder and hegemonism, showing that they can no longer ravage the third world as they please. Take petroleum again as an example. According to statistics published in the United States, total discovered petroleum reserves in 1974 was 93,800 million tons, but total world output of petroleum that year was only 2,800 million tons. How can there be "exhaustion" and "hunger"? The fact is that around 80 per cent of the known reserves is in the third world. With the third world steadily awakening and growing in strength, the superpowers can no longer plunder it at will. The frantic cries of the two hegemonic powers about "energy exhaustion" is but a smokescreen to cover up and create public opinion to facilitate their aggression and plunder. Whenever the U.S. imperialists seized Middle East petroleum in the past, they first of all created public opinion about "energy exhaustion". After World War I, the U.S. propaganda machine was put to work clamouring that "U.S. petroleum resources will soon be exhausted". Soon afterwards, the U.S. State Department clamoured that "open-door" and "equal opportunity" principles should be adopted for the exploitation of Middle East petroleum resources. Thus the U.S. monopoly groups made their way into the Middle East. After World War II, these monopoly groups once again raised a hue and cry about "energy exhaustion", howling that all U.S. produced petroleum had been used up and that if they were to maintain their civilization on the basis of petroleum, they should be ready to go into those rich petroleum areas. Soon after this, they managed to control most of the petroleum resources in the Middle East. The same can be said of the Soviet revisionists. Their "energy hunger" cry is a smokescreen to conceal their outrageous plunder of petroleum wealth so as to wrangle with the U.S. imperialists over Middle East oil. All this illustrates that the so-called energy crisis is a crisis of the imperialist system itself. With the victorious advance of the third world countries and the people of the whole world in their struggle against imperialism, there will soon emerge a new and unprecedented bright era in the history of development of energy sources. [So far the article in Peking Review No. 4/1976, 23.01.1976.] |
||
Back to main
page
|